（全文见PDF版） 美国研究 季刊1999年第2期 AMERICAN STUDIES 第13卷6月5日出版 战后美国对欧洲一体化政策论析赵怀普(7) 民主和平论及其对冷战后美国外交战略的影响郑安光 (31) 美国的西藏政策与“西藏问题”的由来李晔王仲春 (52) 美国南方文艺复兴的动因肖明翰 (77) 现代化与反现代化思潮的冲突卞慕东 (98) ——《飞越杜鹃巢》的文化底蕴 当代美国女性主义思潮述评张立平(113) 1905年抵制美货运动对中美关系的影响王立新(134) 信息 军控与中美关系研讨会综述樊吉社(149) 董乐山先生学术讨论会侧记潘小松(153) 新书架(155) 编后(160) 本期责任编辑：胡国成 本杂志刊登的论文在美国Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life上登有摘要和索引。 编辑出版 中华美国学会 中国社会科学院美国研究所 照排中国社会科学院美国研究所 印刷装钉北京怀柔新华印刷厂 发行、订阅处中国社会科学院美国研究所 （100007北京张自忠路3号东院） http://victorian.fortunecity.com/villiers/685 电子信箱 lihui@isc.cass.net.cn 刊号ISSN1002-8986 CN11-1170／C 国外代号Q1122 国外发行中国国际图书贸易总公司北京399信箱 定价： 国内版5.00元 国际版3.00美元（邮费在外） AMERICAN STUDIES Summer 1999，Vol. 13, No. 2 ARTICLES POSTWAR U.S. POLICY TOWARDS THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATIONZhao Huaipu(7) Out of the concern of its global strategy and selfinterest, the United States e xtended overall support to the European integration in postwar years. In the 196 0s, U.S. considerations were complicated by the aggravating U.S. financial defic it and French president de Gaulles challenge to U.S. hegemony in Europe. U.S. support to the integration was then conditioned within the framework of the Atlan tic Alliance, and this policy line was maintained by all the American administra tions thereafter. The United States will possibly continue its assistance to the integration process as long as American status and role in the Western world ar e not thereby affected. Nevertheless, the support will be weakened or even vanish once the integration goes beyond the scope of American interests. DEMOCRATIC PEACE AND ITS IMPACT ON U.S. POSTCOLD WAR FOREIGN POLICYZheng Anguang (31) Close attention has been paid to the theory of democratic peace, a discourse of great concern to Western scholars of international relations represented by some American scholars. Its basic idea originated as early as the 18th century from Immunuel Kants theme of “perpetual peace” under republicanism. Summing it u p a s “empirical facts”, many American scholars hold that democratic states rarely r esort to force against one another because such practice is contrary to democrac y. Clashes, they believe, are more apt to happen between autocracies and between an autocracy and a democracy. Hence the theory bas bec ome the guiding principle for the United States in foreign policy making. Despit e all its weakness, it helps us understand the U.S. postcold War foreign polic y from a new angle. U.S. TIBET POLICY AND THE ORIGIN OF TIBETAN ISSUELi Ye and Wang Zhongchun (52) Based on declassified U.S. government documents, this article analyzes in detail U.S. meddling in Tibetan affairs, its role in plotting the Dalai Lama cliques fleeing the country, and describes how the Tibetan issue was internationalized. The authors hold that U.S. policy toward Tibet inherited the British theory tha t China had exercised only “suzerainty” over Tibet, thus denying Chinas sove reighty over this territory. This policy took shape during Cold War years, with its basic aim at supporting the activities for “Tibetan independence” of Dalai Lama sepratists, backed by the broader strategy to contain China. Regrettably, the policy has undergone little change for so many years, even after the end of the Cold War. DYNAMICS OF THE SOUTHERN RENAISSANCEXiao Minghan (77) After World War I, culture and literature flourished unprecedentedly in the Amer ican South, which is referred to as the Southern Renaissance. It arised, the aut hor argues, in an era when historical changes were taking place in the South. It was the product that modernization dashed against the traditional society and m odes of thought, the result that the modernist movement combined with the Southe rn literary tradition, and an achievement that the Southern writers and schol ars deeply selfexamined and explored into the history, society and culture in the South. CONFLICT BETWEEN MODERNIZATION AND ANTIMODERNIZATION: KEN KESEYS ONE FLEW THE CUCKOOS NESTBian Mudong (98) Built on the basis of modernization, the American civilization is nonetheless en cumbered with modernization itself and thus results in conflict. The way to solv e the dilemma is merely fleeing and keeping away from modern civilization. This is the gist of One Flew the Cuckoos Nest, a novel by the Ameri can writer Ken Ke sey. While the idealistic idyllic dream can hardly come true, the author makes a n assessment of the antimodernization showing both its good points and shortco mings. MODERN AMERICAN FEMINISMZhang Liping(113) Commenting on the six schools of thought of the modern American Feminism, the au thor holds that it has become rich and colorful after absorbing a lot of theoret ical concepts and after making a summary of the feminist thinking. By broadening ones horizon, it provides a new angle to approach social and political issues and a powerful ideological weapon for the enhancement of womens status and for the elimination of sexbased discrimination. However, nondialectical viewpoin ts prevail therein, such as prizing equality above liberty, antagonism above unity and groups above individuals. As theories, they look jumbled, disorderly and se lfcontradictory. THE IMPACT OF THE 1905 CHINESE BOYCOTTS ON SINOAMERICAN RELATIONSWang Lixin(134) The article argues that the Chinese boycotts against American goods in 1905 were not pure commercial activities, exerting an influence far beyond the economic d omain. The movement not only rendered large amount of American goods unsalable a nd sharply decreased their export to China, but also impaired the good image of the United States in Chinese hearts, aroused widespread malice among Chinese peo ple, damaged American missionary undertakings in China and weakened the impact o f American culture on China. ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES A SUMMARY OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON “ARM CONTROL AND THE SINOU.S. RELATIONSHIP”Fan Jishe(149) SIDELIGHTS ON A SYMPOSIUM COMMEMORATING THE LATE MR. DONG LESHAN(153) NEW BOOKS(155) EDITORS NOTE (160) Articles appearing in this journal are abstracted and indexed in HISTORICAL ABSTRACTS and AMERICA: HISTORY AND LIFE. AMERICAN STUDIES, a quarterly, is published jointly by the Chinese Association for American Studies and the Institute of American Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The content of the articles in this journal should not be construed as reflecting the views of either the Association or the Institute.