（全文见PDF版） 美 国 研 究 季 刊 1994年第2期 AMERICAN STUDIES 第8卷 6月5日出版 论美国黑人继续遭受种族歧视的症结及其出路 杨立文（7） 美国土著部落地位的演变与印第安人的公民权问题 李剑鸣（30） 竞争性的相互依存 朱文莉（52） 　　——冷战终结前后的美日关系 略论费正清 徐国琦（73） 1945-1955年中美关系史论文引文分析 侯颖丽（96） ○书评S 政如其人 崇 岭（116） 　　——读《基辛格传》 中国美国学史：一个新的研究课题 杨玉圣（121） 　　——兼评李本京先生等的新著 　　 ○短论 19世纪末美国公众舆论评述 李庆余（137） 美国军事思想溯源 陈海宏（143） 美国军事战略调整评析 汪徐和（148） ○新书架 （154） 本期责任编辑: 赵 梅 编辑出版 中华美国学 中国社会科学院美国研究所 照排 中国社会科学院美国研究所 印刷装钉 北京仰山印刷厂 发行、订阅处 中国社会科学院美国研究所 北京建国门内大街5号 刊号 ISSN1002-8986/CN11-1170／C@ 国外代号 Q1122 国外发行 中国国际图书贸易总公司 北京399信箱 定价: 国内版3.00元 国际版3.00美元（邮费在外） AMERICAN STUDIES Summer 1994 Vol. 8, No. 2 ARTICLES ESSAYS THE CRUX AND SOLUTION OF THE CONTINUED RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AGAINST AFRO-AMERICANS Yang Liwen（7） While having won basic civil rights, Afro-Americans today still suffer from racial discrimination. The crux lies in the backwardness of their education. Hence devoting great efforts to promoting the education of American blacks and raising their cultural levels is the way to free themselves from the present difficult position. This is also the road they must take to improve their condition in the long run. THE EVOLUTION OF THE STATUS OF NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES AND THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF INDIANS Li Jianming（30） The U.S. government and white communities have been trying unilaterally to civilize the American Indians, elimnate their tribes which are regarded as backward and uncivilized, and remould tribesmen into American citizens. However, the Indians, with their unique cultural tradition and inferior technological skills, are unable to compete with the white people. So what civil rights can bring them are for the most part just new sufferings, and the restoration of tribes and the self-determination movement have not brought them much benefit, because they find it hard to strike a balance among tribal membership, wardship and American citizenship. COMPETITIVE INTERDEPENDENCE: POST-COLD WAR U.S.-JAPAN RELATIONSHIP Zhu Wenli（52） The end of the Cold War has made a great impact on the special relationship between the United States and Japan. This has not merely intensified the existing frictions between the two countries, but also given rise to new tensions, when they are trying to redefine their national interests under a new international environment. The exacerbation of frictions and the growth of interdependence are two major features of the U.S.-Japan relationship in the post-Cold War era. The relationship can be summerized as a "competitive interdependence" and will remain this way in the foreseeable future. ON JOHN KING FAIRBANK Xu Guoqi（73）） John King Fairbank, the father of modern Chinese studies in the West, was the main academic spokesman promoting Sino-U.S. relationship. As the founder of Chinese studies who devoted all his energy to this field, he made substantial academic achievements thereto not readily surmountable. In Sino-U.S. relations, he played the dual role of a scholar and a government advisor and made significant contributions to the improvement of the bilateral relationship and the mutual understanding between the two peoples. AN ANALYSIS OF SOURCE MATERIALS IN THE ARTICLES ON THE HISTORY OF SINO-U.S. RELATIONS (1945-1955) Hou Yingli（96） By means of an analysis of source materials in the articles on the history of Sino-U.S. relations (1945-1955) written by Chinese and Americans scholars from 1979-1989, it can be concluded that a wide gap exists between the academic levels of the two scholarly communities. In the United States the research on this episode of history seems well-developed, while in China there are still new areas for scholars to explore. BOOK REVIEWS KISSINGER: A BIOGRAPHY by Walter Isaacson Chong Ling（116） A CRITICAL REVIEW OF #FKAN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF AMERICAN STUDIES IN PRC#FS#FS by Prof. Thomas B. Lee and Geogre Yu Yang Yu Sheng（121） ACADEMIC DIGEST U.S. PUBLIC OPINIONS IN THE 19TH CENTURY Li Qingyu（137） TRACING TO THE SOURCE OF AMERICAN MILITARY THOUGHTS Chen Haihong（143） COMMENTS ON THE READJUSTMENT OF U.S. MILITARY STRATEGY Wang Xuhe（148） NEW BOOKS（154） AMERICAN STUDIES, a quarterly, is published jointly by the Chinese Association for American Studies, and the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The content of the articles in this journal should not be construed as reflecting the views either of the Association or the Institute.